- #Topaz adjust ai vs luminar ai pro#
- #Topaz adjust ai vs luminar ai software#
- #Topaz adjust ai vs luminar ai iso#
- #Topaz adjust ai vs luminar ai crack#
For its first crack at AI noise reduction, Luminar Neo is surprisingly good. The fact that I really had to zoom in to tell a difference should be telling, though. I’ve experienced this with Topaz before, and it’s probably my number one qualm about the software.īased on this photo, DxO PureRAW is still the king of denoising - despite its lack of controls - followed by a tie between Topaz DeNoise and Luminar Neo Noiseless AI. Topaz did retain more detail while taking out additional noise (especially Vanelli’s shirt and around his eyes), but it also left some noise in weird places, like the top of Vanelli’s hair, and the silver pieces in the upper right of the image. Topaz DeNoise and Luminar Neo are even closer, and honestly, it’s tough for me to pick a winner between those two. The blacks here are also richer you can really see Vanelli’s logo popping on the black of his shirt. The clearest and sharpest is definitely DxO PureRAW. Without some type of noise reduction, this image would not be usable.Īll three results are incredibly similar, but we can see a few minor differences.
#Topaz adjust ai vs luminar ai iso#
I used this image below of our very own Vanelli, which was shot on a Micro Four Thirds camera with an ISO of 5000. But how does it stand up to some of the industry’s leaders? Sure, Luminar Neo’s Noiseless AI is a great option. It’s great to have these tools as a part of the overall ecosystem, and it eliminates Luminar users from having to purchase third-party applications when everything can be done right inside the host program. Speed issues aside, Noiseless AI does a nice job, and it’s a great option for those who rely on Luminar Neo on a daily basis. I can’t imagine how long it would take on an older machine. Using one of Luminar Neo’s sample images from a Nikon D800, setting Noiseless AI to the High setting took 15 seconds to render. Noiseless AI - especially when you first run an image through it - is pretty slow. There was one big flaw, though, at least with the beta version I had. Details stayed sharp, and Noiseless AI seemed to do what it promises. Overall, Luminar Neo did a nice job here, and the results were effective in reducing noise in my images. You can use the eye icon in the tool to see what your image looked like before and after the adjustment. Once Noiseless AI is complete, it’ll zoom in on your image, letting you see the noise that’s been reduced. This lets you use the brush, gradients and Mask AI tools to select only parts of your image to be affected by Noiseless AI.
You can take it a step further, too, by going over to the Masking tab. Three sliders are present in the Adjustments tab - Luminosity Denoise, Details and Sharpness. Not really looking at anything else for now, but of course all advice will be considered and appreciated.Once you choose one of the three presets, you’ll have options to further tweak the results. The two in the title interest me, but I'm not sure which would be better for me. Perhaps occasionally I may want to play around with things like HDR, bracketing and some artistic coloring & effects etc.
I have no interest in spending hours editing a photo, I just want to do things like sharpen, crop, adjust WB, exposure, color, etc.
#Topaz adjust ai vs luminar ai pro#
I'm getting older and don't have the time nor patience for the learning curves of the popular pro type software. I've never used Light Room, or any Adobe product, but have watched some how-to videos and find them all too daunting. I've tried playing with Gimp and gave up.
#Topaz adjust ai vs luminar ai software#
Some of the software I've tried so far is Silkypix, Corel Aftershot Pro 3, and another one I can't remember now. I mostly shoot RAW+JPEG, and a variety of subjects landscape, people, buildings, pretty much anything and everything.
Hi, I'm fairly new here at DPR, and photography is a hobby, I don't do it professionally.
0 kommentar(er)
